reversemortgagelenders.com.auCode sections 17(15A), 18B, 67A, 185A

Code sections
17(15A), 18B,
67A, 185A

Other people living in a reverse mortgaged home

A reverse mortgage contract may give a person other than the borrower a right against the lender to live in the home, or it may not. The National Credit Code says what the contract must contain if it does, what the borrower must be told in writing if it does not, and which later changes are void.

General information, not financial or legal advice. The official place to check is Moneysmart’s page on reverse mortgages; the law itself is on the Federal Register of Legislation.

s 18B(1) the term

The tenancy protection provision

The Code gives the protection a name in section 18B. It applies where a proposed reverse mortgage contract:

“does not include a provision (a tenancy protection provision) for a person other than the debtor to have a right against the credit provider to occupy the reverse mortgaged property.”

National Credit Code, section 18B(1)

This guide reads “the debtor” as the borrower and “the credit provider” as the lender. The right in question is one held against the lender, to occupy the home.

s 17(15A) included

If the contract includes it

Section 17 lists what a contract document must contain. For a reverse mortgage that lets someone else live in the home, subsection (15A) adds this:

“(15A) If the credit contract for a reverse mortgage is to make provision for a person other than the debtor to occupy the reverse mortgaged property, the contract document must contain provisions that have the following effect (whether or not the document also contains other provisions relating to such occupation by such a person):”

National Credit Code, section 17(15A)

The provisions it then sets out deal with a nomination. Its paragraph (a) lets the debtor act “at any time (before, when or after the contract is made)”, naming, in the Code’s words, “a person who is to be allowed to occupy the property (whether alone or with other persons)”. It also covers revoking “such a nomination by notice given to the credit provider”. Paragraph (b) gives the nomination its force:

“(b) while a nomination described in paragraph (a) is in force, the nominated person has the same rights (against the credit provider) to occupy the property as the debtor has or would have apart from the death of the debtor or vacation of the property by the debtor.”

National Credit Code, section 17(15A)(b)

Put plainly: while the nomination is in force, the nominated person has the same rights against the lender to live in the home as the borrower has, or would have had if the borrower had not died or moved out.

s 18B(2)–(5) left out

If the contract leaves it out

Section 18B deals with a proposed contract that has no tenancy protection provision. The borrower must then be told so in writing, and the duty falls on two kinds of person:

Section 18B: who must tell the borrower, in writing, that there is no tenancy protection provision
WhoWhen the duty bitesPenalty
A person providing a credit service relating to the contract, other than the person who is or will be the credit providerMust not provide the credit service until they have told the debtor50 penalty units, strict liability
The credit providerMust not enter into the contract until it has told the debtor50 penalty units, strict liability

In both cases the telling must be “in writing in the form (if any) prescribed by the regulations”. Subsection (5) makes both offences ones of strict liability.

s 67A void changes

Changes the Code makes void

Once a contract makes provision for someone else to live in the home, section 67A protects it from being weakened later. A change to such a contract is void so far as it tries to do any of these three things:

  • Take out what section 17(15A) requires, in the Code’s words: “remove a provision required by subsection 17(15A) to be contained in the contract document”.
  • Narrow the borrower’s power to nominate, described as “the ability of the debtor to nominate to the credit provider a person who is to be allowed to occupy the reverse mortgaged property (whether alone or with other persons)”.
  • Narrow the nominee’s position, described as “the rights of a person nominated by the debtor to the credit provider to occupy the property.”

The section speaks of a “purported change”, and makes it void so far as it does any of these things.

s 185A the record

The lender’s record of nominations

“(1) A credit provider under a credit contract for a reverse mortgage that provides for the debtor to nominate to the credit provider a person who is to be allowed to occupy the reverse mortgaged property, and to revoke such a nomination, must keep in accordance with the regulations a record of any such nominations and revocations.”

National Credit Code, section 185A(1)

The record is the credit provider’s duty. It covers nominations and revocations alike, and the regulations set how it is kept.

Occupancy and the grounds for enforcement

Two of the events that section 18A bars as grounds for enforcement are about who lives in the home: not giving evidence that the borrower or a nominated person occupies it, while the borrower lives there, and leaving the home unoccupied while it is the borrower’s principal place of residence. They are read in full in what the contract must not include.

Summary

The four sections at a glance

Each section answers a different question about someone else living in the home. Read in order, they follow a contract from before it is signed to the years it runs.

Other people in the home: which section answers which question
QuestionSectionWhat the Code says
Does the contract give anyone else a right to live there?s 18B(1)If not, it has no tenancy protection provision.
If it does, what must it contain?s 17(15A)Provisions on nominating a person and revoking a nomination, and the nominated person’s rights against the lender.
If it does not, who must say so?s 18B(2)–(4)The credit provider, and any other person providing a credit service on the contract, in writing.
Can a later change take the protection away?s 67AA change is void so far as it removes the provisions or limits nominations or a nominee’s rights.
Who keeps track of nominations?s 185AThe credit provider, in a record kept as the regulations require.

“Before it is signed” is the Code’s own timing: the person providing a credit service must not provide it, and the credit provider must not enter into the contract, until the borrower has been told.